IndyMac / ONEWEST why is DEUTSCHE BANK or the TRUST not named as the Plaintiff? How did you end up with my NOTE?

(see picture below) Many have read my first post FORECLOSURE FRAUD…”The Greatest American Bank Robbery” A GREED STORY. Still I wonder exactly how and why the Judge granted Final Summary Judgment? Take a look at my note and question how? when? & why? Remember they never submitted this nor did they have a photo copy at the hearing! When I asked her who she represented she did not answer. From the look of the assignments it looks like both parties since Mers is also listed as a Defendant and there is 2 different assignments to the same property with the same officer signing on behalf of both …2 separate entities same officer umm any conflicts?  Apparently not to the Judge or Law Offices Of David J. Stern P.A. since they prepared both these assignments. But miraculously MERS to assignment by virtue months after the commencement of the foreclosure…who would buy a loan in default?  

See, e.g., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Rose Harris, Index No. 35549/07, Supreme Court of NY (Brooklyn), February 5, 2008, in which the Court (Honorable Justice Arthur Schack) wrote: “…Plaintiff’s affidavit, Erica Johnson-Seck, submitted in support of the instant application for a default judgment, was executed by claims to be a Vice President of plaintiff DEUTSCHE BANK. The affidavit was executed in the state of Texas, County of Williamson… The Court is perplexed as to why the Assignment was not executed in Pasadena, California, at 460 Sierra Madre Village, the alleged “principal place of business” for both the assignor and the assignee. In my January 31, 2008 decision (Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Maraj [citation omitted]), I noted that Erica Johnson-Seck, claimed that she was a Vice President of MERS in her July 3, 2007 INDYMAC to DEUTSCHE BANK assignment, and then in her July 31, 2007 affidavit claimed to be a DEUTSCHE BANK Vice President. Just as in Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Maraj, at 2, the Court, in the instant action, before granting an application for an order of reference, requires an affidavit from Erica Johnson-Seck, describing her employment history for the past three years. Further, the Court requires an explanation from an officer of plaintiff DEUTSCHE BANK as to why, in the middle of our national subprime mortgage financial crisis, DEUTSCHE BANK would purchase a non- performing loan from INDYMAC, and why DEUTSCHE BANK, INDYMAC, and MERS all share office space at 460 Sierra Madre Villa, Pasadena, CA 91107.” (emphasis added) 

Thanks for the 2nd DCA ruling and then this Senator Michael Bennett is proposing this bill ? But here MBA admit banks DO NOT HAVE THE NOTES therefore, they have absolutely NO standing!!! I think Alfred Hitchcock could solve this mystery since it would make a great Twilight Zone series…not enough time for an episode. 

Ok…lets take a look at my “ORIGINAL NOTE” …Wonder what the next homeowner will think of “title” to my stolen house due to fraud? I know when a car’s VIN number is forged it is null and void and ceased from you. hmmm 

 

 

 

Where are these missing assignments?