AMERICA take Notes From Mr. Davies Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis The Baseline ScenarioSadler joined by supporters to resist home foreclosure eviction scheduled for…5/3/2010
Filed under: foreclosure fraud | Tagged: dinsfla, din_sfla, Eviction, foreclosure, keith sadler, ohio, protest, toledo | Leave a comment »
By Laura Rice TOLEDO24
Monday, May 03, 2010 at 8:23 p.m.
WOOD COUNTY, OH — A Wood County man facing foreclosure has boarded himself up in his home along with five others.
They are refusing to leave, despite a court order, and they say they will be there until Wood County Sheriff’s Officers drag them out.
Protestors are gathered outside Keith Sadler’s home of 20 years in rural Wood County trying to bring public attention to what they say is unfair action by banks and trying to keep the sheriff’s department from kicking him out.
“So far they have not come. Probably because of the strong public presence that has been so basically we can call this a victory for the day and hopefully we can carry that through tomorrow and the rest of the foreclosure,” said Lance Crandall, Toledo Foreclosure Defense League.
But the real action is going on inside, where Sadler and five others are locked up with supplies with no plans to leave.
NBC24 spoke with Sadler over an internet connection.
“They’re going to have to drag us out. We’re not going to willingly walk out,” said Sadler.
Sadler emphasizes that this is a peaceful protest and that they do not have any weapons.
He says he is doing this for himself.
“Because it’s my home,” said Sadler.
But also for all the others that could not keep up with house payments. Sadler was off work after a hand injury.
“I cut all the avenues that I could before that to try to make payments, to try to keep as close to on time as I could and of course it was getting impossible,” said Sadler.
What Sadler wants now is a moratorium on foreclosures. But, in talks with Wood County Sheriff Mark Wasylyshyn, that is not happening.
“(The Sheriff is) basically refusing to do that, saying it’s his duty to uphold the law of the courts even though the laws are immoral and unjust,” said Sadler.
NBC24 spoke with Sheriff Wasylyshyn who said it is Sadler who has broken his word.
Wasylyshyn met with him weeks ago to discuss an eviction plan and he says Sadler agreed to leave peacefully.
Wasylyshyn says sheriff’s deputies will remove the protestors from the property but he would not say when. He says his top priority is keeping his officers safe.
Filed under: foreclosure fraud | Tagged: Breaking, Community, Consumer, Crime, dinsfla, din_sfla, Economy, Eviction, foreclosure, Home, House, keith sadler, Local, Moratorium, News, Politics, Sheriff Mark Wasylyshyn, Strange, toledo, Wood County | 2 Comments »
This in via e-mail from the Foreclosure Defense League, they held a press conference on Sunday May 2nd, at 6:00 p.m., in addition to the below release, FOX Toledo reported on this story (link):
On Monday May 3rd, Keith Sadler of Stony Ridge will be evicted from his home. But unlike many in a similar situation, Mr. Sadler intends to resist his foreclosure and stay in his home illegally.
“I am resisting this eviction through non-violent civil disobedience,” states Sadler. “It’s time to make a stand against this corrupt system.”
Alongside Sadler stands a group of community members from the Toledo Foreclosure Defense League, a Northwest Ohio coalition of housing activists. TFDL is also joined by the national group Take Back the Land based out of Miami, Florida.
Sadler, along with the Toledo Foreclosure Defense League, will be peacefully occupying the foreclosed home by sealing themselves inside until the foreclosure is called off and a moratorium on all foreclosures is enacted.
“Housing is a human right. While banks are being bailed out, people are being thrown into the streets. The time has come to take back our land and our communities,” said Sadler.
Following Sunday’s press conference May 2nd at 6pm, activists will lock themselves inside until their demands are met.
Supporters have set up live streaming video and online content at the following web addresses:
LIVE 24 hour coverage from inside the home:
(link)
Live coverage goes online at 6:00pm Eastern Standard Time at the scheduled press conference. No broadcasts will be made until then.
Youtube:
(link)
Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/TFDLOH
or text “follow@TFDLOH” to 40404
Filed under: foreclosure fraud, stopforeclosurefraud.com | Tagged: dinsfla, din_sfla, evicted, Eviction, florida, keith sadler, Miami, stony ridge, supporters, Take Back the Land, TFDL, toledo | 1 Comment »
THIS IS WORTH REPEATING OVER AND OVER!!!!
From: Neil Garfield Livinglies
Fla Judge rehearing of summary judgement 4 04 10
RIGHT ON POINT ABOUT WHAT WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT IN HEARING YESTERDAY!!
I appeared as expert witness in a case yesterday where the Judge had trouble getting off the idea that it was an accepted fact that the note was in default and that ANY of the participants in the securitization chain should be considered collectively “creditors” or a creditor. Despite the fact that the only witness was a person who admitted she had no knowledge except what was on the documents given to her, the Judge let them in as evidence.
The witness was and is incompetent because she lacked personal knowledge and could not provide any foundation for any records or document. This is the predominant error of Judges today in most cases. Thus the prima facie case is considered “assumed” and the burden to prove a negative falls unfairly on the homeowner.
The Judge, in a familiar refrain, had trouble with the idea of giving the homeowner a free house when the only issue before him was whether the motion to lift stay should be granted. Besides the fact that the effect of granting the motion to lift stay was the gift of a free house to ASC who admits in their promotional website that they have in interest nor involvement in the origination of the loans, and despite the obviously fabricated assignment a few days before the hearing which violated the terms of the securitization document cutoff date, the Judge seems to completely missed the point of the issue before him: whether there was a reason to believe that the movant lacked standing or that the foreclosure would prejudice the debtor or other creditors (since the house would become an important asset of the bankruptcy estate if it was unencumbered).
If you carry over the arguments here, the motion for lift stay is the equivalent motion for summary judgment.
This transcript, citing cases, shows that the prima facie burden of the Movant is even higher than beyond a reasonable doubt. It also shows that the way the movants are using business records violates all standards of hearsay evidence and due process. Read the transcript carefully. You might want to use it for a motion for rehearing or motion for reconsideration to get your arguments on record, clear up the issue of whether you objected on the basis of competence of the witness, and then take it up on appeal with a cleaned up record.
Judge reversed his own ruling that had granted summary judgment to GMAC Mortgage (DAVID J. STERN)
Filed under: assignment of mortgage, Law Offices Of David J. Stern P.A. | Tagged: bubble, CDO, corruption, currency, debbie visicaro, dinsfla, Eviction, expert witness, foreclosure, foreclosure mill, GTC | Honor, HERS, Investor, law offices of david J. stern plantation florida 33324, mortgage, pinellas county florida, PL, ricardo, securities fraud, servicer, summary judgment reversed, wysalik & kaniuk | 1 Comment »
The foreclosure process varies somewhat from state to state, and depends primarily on whether the state uses mortgages or deeds of trust for the purchase of real property. Generally, states that use mortgages conduct judicial foreclosures, using the court system to execute the foreclosure; states that use deeds of trust conduct non-judicial foreclosures, using an out-of-court procedure defined by state law.
To foreclose in accordance with the judicial procedure, a lender must prove in court that the mortgagor is in default. Once the lender has exhausted its attempts to resolve the default with the homeowner, the next step is to contact an attorney to pursue court action. The attorney contacts the mortgagor(homeowner) to try to resolve the default. If the mortgagor is unable to pay off the default, the attorney files a lawsuit against the mortgagor to establish the default amount and the right to have the collateral(home) sold and the sale proceeds applied towards the outstanding loan. The purpose of the action is to provide evidence of a default and get the court’s approval to initiate foreclosure. In connection with the lawsuit, a lis pendens (lawsuit pending notice) is filed with the county clerk or other public property records repository. The lis pendens gives notice to the public that a pending action has been filed against the borrower in default to collect the defaulted debt, including having the collateral (home) sold.
Non-judicial foreclosures are based on deeds of trust that contain a power-of-sale clause. The clause enables the trustee to initiate a foreclosure sale of the collateral(home), without having to file a lawsuit or go to court. The trustee is typically required to issue a notice of default and notify the trustor (borrower) accordingly about the defaulted loan status. If the trustor does not respond, the trustee then initiates the steps for conducting the foreclosure sale of the collateral (home).
Filed under: foreclosure fraud, forensic mortgage investigation audit | Tagged: 20 day complaint, auction, Eviction, foreclosure laws, foreclosure states, realty trac, right of redemption | Leave a comment »
Posted: Mar 16, 2010 6:43 PM EDT Updated: Mar 17, 2010 3:45 PM EDT
LAS VEGAS — Gary and Paulette Stelton look through the mortgage paperwork of their old North Las Vegas home.
Last year, Paulette fell ill. Medical expenses swamped them. They tried to renegotiate their home loan with IndyMac Mortgage Services. Instead, IndyMac began foreclosure.
The Steltons now rent a home.
What they didn’t expect was a call from IndyMac this week congratulating them on being approved for a loan modification several months after IndyMac changed the locks.
“I wish the guy would have been here. I would have beat the living hell out of him — I’m sorry. They played games with us each and every month,” said Gary Stelton.
Ian Hirsch, with Fortress Credit Services, says IndyMac is one of the worst banks doing business in Nevada.
“Specifically with IndyMac Bank, I tell people that they have a loan with the devil,” he said.
IndyMac’s parent company says they never evicted the Steltons. They changed the locks after the Stelton’s refused to talk to the bank anymore. After repeated calls by 8 News Now, IndyMac Bank says they will look further into how they can help the Steltons keep their home.
IndyMac’s parent company OneWest Bank also calls the comments from Hirsch “inflammatory” and “confused.”
Filed under: corruption, foreclosure fraud | Tagged: approved modification, Eviction, mortgage modification | Leave a comment »
When will ALL this Bull Shit come to an END? Everything is a stage and all these “Non-Bank’s” are characters!
Submitted by BMcDonald
Most of us are trying to get the info from the banks, which they will not do unless forced. Well, now many of us can walk right in through the back door. FOIA requests! I fought for 7 months to get the bank to cough up the info and it only took 6 days by going through the FDIC. So now I’m in the drivers seat. This damned bank has been lying from day one claiming they are the sole beneficiary of my loan. Now they have committed the fraud and done the crime by illegally selling my home. They are now in deep, deep, trouble.
I’ve been fighting OneWest Bank since August of last year here in Colorado. In Colorado they have nonjudicial foreclosures and the laws as so totally banker-biased it’s insane. All the bank has to do is go to the public trustee with a note from an attorney who “certifies” that the bank is the owner of the loan. What they don’t tell you is the bank has to go before a judge and get an order for sale in a 120 hearing. Most only find out about it at the last minute and don’t even show up because the only issue discussed is whether a default has occurred or not.
I discovered however that if you raise the question of whether the foreclosing party is a true party in interest or not, the court has to hear that as well. I raised that issue and demanded the bank produce the original documents and endorsements or assignements. The judge only ordered them to produce originals, which they did.
Long story short, I managed to hold them off for seven months after hiring an attorney. I found a bankruptcy case from CA in 2008 in which IndyMac produced original documents and ended up having to admit they didn’t own them. I had a letter from OneWest that only stated they purchased servicing rights. I had admissions from the bank’s attorney that there were no endorsements. And at the last minute I discovered the FDIC issued a press release in response to a YouTube video that went viral over the sweetheart deal OneWest did with the FDIC. The FDIC stated in their press release that OneWest only owned 7% of the loans they service. I presented all this to the judge but he ended up ignoring it all and gave OneWest an order to sell my home, which they did on the 4th.
About a week before the sale I went directly to the FDIC and filed a FOIA request for any and all records indicating ownership rights and servicing rights related to my loans and gave them my loan numbers. I managed to get the info in about 6 days. I got PROOF from the FDIC that OneWest did not own my loan. Fredie Mac did. And the info came directly from OneWest systems. And just last Friday I got a letter from IndyMac Mortgage services, obviously in compliance with the FOIA request that Freddie Mac owned the loan. So I now have a confession from OneWest themselves that they have been lying all along! I have a motion in to have the sale set aside and once that’s done I’m going to sue the hell out of them and their attorneys in Federal court.
So I found a wonderful little back door to the proof most of us need. If the FDIC is involved, you can do a FOIA request for the info. I don’t know if it applies to all banks since they are all involved in the FDIC. You all should try it to see.
Most of us are trying to get the info from the banks, which they will not do unless forced. Well, now many of us can walk right in through the back door. FOIA requests! I fought for 7 months to get the bank to cough up the info and it only took 6 days by going through the FDIC. So now I’m in the drivers seat. This damned bank has been lying from day one claiming they are the sole beneficiary of my loan. Now they have committed the fraud and done the crime by illegally selling my home. They are now in deep, deep, trouble.
Filed under: AIG FRAUD, assignment and assumption agreement, concealment, conspiracy, corruption, fdic, FOIA, foreclosure fraud, foreclosure mills, freedom of information act, indymac, Law Offices Of David J. Stern P.A., Lender Processing Services Inc., livinglies, LPS, MERS, neil garfield, note, onewest, respa, scam | Tagged: bubble, CDO, corruption, currency, Eviction, fdic, FOIA, foreclosure, Freddie Mac, freedom of information act, GTC | Honor, indymac, Investor, mortgage, OneWest Bank, securities fraud | 1 Comment »
FMI-AUDIT Blog LIVINGLIES by Neil Garfield WAMU SUPPORT GROUP
Coming soon...
Real Property Cases filed
The information herein should not be taken as legal advice and is not a substitute for the assistance of a licensed advisor.
I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY.
Help the fight! Stopping Illegal Bank Foreclosure Fraud. Information on MERS and Bank Securitized Fraud cases resources.
For Promotion Use Only-
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA 
You must be logged in to post a comment.